Cong Wang Niansun dui "Er ya" shou san pian de yan jiu kan qi dui yin, yi yuan li de gou jian yu shi jian

M.Phil.Wang Nian-sun（王念孫 1744－1832）was an outstanding scholar, especially in the aspects of textual criticism and Exegesis in the Qian-jia period（乾嘉時期）of the Qing Dynasty. Guangya Shuzheng（廣雅疏證）is his representative masterpiece. In the San-guo period（三國時期）, Zhang Yi（張揖）wrote Guangya（廣雅）as to expand and supplement the contents of Erya（爾雅）, the two books are closely related. Wang Nian-sun decided to start his studies on Erya, however, at the time being, Shao Jin-han（邵晉涵 1743－1796）completed Erya Zhengyi（爾雅正義）and when Hao Yi-xing（郝懿行 1757－1825）was writing Erya Yishu（爾雅義疏）, he had consulted Wang. Both two books are great annotations of Erya. Therefore, Wang diverted his studies from Erya to Guangya.Although Wang Nian-sun did not devote a book specifically to Erya’s studies, he used Erya as a significant source contributed to his writing of Guangya Shuzheng. Erya Yishu has two types of versions currently circulating. They are full version and deleted version. The problem of who is the editor of the deleted version had being argued among scholars. Until 1920, Luo Zhen-yu（羅振玉 1866－1940）got a handwritten version of Erya Yishu. From that time on, it is assured that the deleted version of Erya Yishu was edited by Wang Nian-sun and it became an important source on the research of Wang’s Erya studies.Wang Nian-sun was prominent in sound and meaning studies. It is found that most of Wang’s edition of Erya Yishu were related to Phonology and Exegesis. With the vast amount of sources were used and deductive arguments were applied, Wang’s studies contain scientific logical thinking. Through comparing the first three chapters of the two versions of Erya Yishu, which can single out the amount of contents in Erya deleted by Wang, accompanied with Guangya Shuzheng and the four types of handwritten sources of Wang Nian-sun preserved in The Peking University Library, this thesis aims to discuss and reflect the studies of Erya of Wang, as well as to understand and analyze the principles of Phonology, Exegesis and the scientific research methods of Wang by his practical studies of the above mentioned classical texts.王念孫（1744－1832）是清代乾嘉時期著名的校勘學家、訓詁學家，《廣雅疏證》是其學術研究的重要著作，至今仍廣受學者重視。三國時期的張揖編寫《廣雅》旨在增廣《爾雅》之未備，二書關係密切。王念孫早年有志於《爾雅》的研究，不過，與其同時的邵晉涵（1743－1796）作《爾雅正義》，此書體大思精，郝懿行（1757－1825）作《爾雅義疏》，昕夕過問王氏，亦為治《爾雅》之鉅制，故王氏捨《爾雅》而治《廣雅》。王念孫雖然沒有研究《爾雅》的專著，但在《廣雅疏證》中有不少引用《爾雅》成訓之例。又現今流傳的《爾雅義疏》有足本和節本兩種，對於節本由何人刪改，學界一度眾說紛紜，莫衷一是。及至1920年，羅振玉（1866-1940）得到《爾雅義疏》寫本，確定《爾雅義疏》節本出於王念孫之手，是研究王念孫對《爾雅》訓釋的重要材料。王氏以聲音通訓詁著稱，考其疏證《廣雅》及刪校《爾雅義疏》的內容多涉及音韻、訓詁的問題，校釋旁徵博引，推演論證，具有科學的邏輯研究精神。本文以王念孫刪校《爾雅義疏》首三篇為範圍，輔以《廣雅疏證》、北京大學圖書館館藏《高郵王石臞先生手稿四種》等材料，一方面探討王氏對《爾雅》的研究，另一方面從他的研究實踐中，瞭解其聲訓原理、詞義觀念及科學化的研究方法。周慧儀."2017年12月".Thesis M.Phil. Chinese University of Hong Kong 2018.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 335-348).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Title from PDF title page (viewed on July 20, 2020).Zhou Huiyi